Monday, December 16, 2013

Moses Tutoring #7


In my second session with Eric, we looked over the research that he had done and he opined to me his feelings about the issue.  We then set out to write an outline.  We chose 3 areas that were of controversy.  1) Is animal testing valid in its translation to human results; 2) Is animal testing necessary; and 3) Is animal testing humane and are there guidelines and safeguards.

The first paragraph talked about these three areas and he drew the hypothesis that animal testing was a necessary evil.  In the second paragraph, he compared the opinions of different experts from both sides of the issue and ended with the conclusion that if the right animal is chosen for the right category of disease, the results are very relevant to human anatomy. In the third paragraph, he came to the conclusion that results when animals were used, the efficacy rate of cures rose significantly over, say, modeling.  In the fourth paragraph, he could not way that the outlines were uniform in all labs and felt that they needed implovement.  In the final paragraph, he reiterated his position that, although not perfect, the benefits of animal test far outweighed its flaws.

We set up the next session for the next night.

No comments:

Post a Comment